Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1938No. 26953. En BancPublished

1DissentSteinert, C. J.

(dissenting) — The majority opinion holds (1) that the respondent employer, having acquiesced in the departmental decision by its failure to appeal, is concluded thereby and is therefore estopped from attacking it collaterally; and (2) that, as a consequence, the appellant workman is entitled to maintain, in the courts, a common law action for damages against the employer.

I am unable to agree with the majority upon either of these propositions.

I. The duty to appeal arises only when there is a right to appeal. A right to appeal from an order, decision or award of the department is given only…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API