Legal Opinion

Hilde v. United States Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1987No. 74822PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Chief Judge.

Dismissal for Failure to State Action — Denial of Summary Judgment. Richard Hilde is the insured of United States Fire Insurance Company. Hilde operates an aircraft to spray chemical insecticides for agricultural purposes. The policy of insurance provided that necessary certification of financial responsibility required by the Georgia Pesticide Use and Application Act had been established by Hilde through the insurance coverage provided by U. S. Fire to cover damages to agricultural crops, plants, or land caused by the use of chemicals, dusting powders, and the like…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. United States Fire Insurance v. HildeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Jaynes v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Company, and Boston Old Colony Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. First Financial Insurance v. American Sandblasting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Clark-Peterson Co. v. Independent Insurance Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Gibson v. Southern General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Reedy v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API