Smith v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By BARNES, J.
Counsel for plaintiff in error in his brief in substance says that they are relying upon one point of error and that is that the judgment and finding of the court is against the manifest weight of the evidence. In considering this question it is necessary to read and examine the entire record. We have so done.
In considering and determining this question we have in mind the rules of law relative to condonation and also that divorce cannot be granted on uncorroborated testimony of the parties. But for these rules of law, we would have no difficulty. There is *537evidence…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Huffine v. HuffineVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas · 1947
- Hobbs v. HobbsOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- Glimcher v. GlimcherOhio Court of Appeals · 1971