Legal Opinion
Lunsford v. Cemex, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided July 28, 2010No. 1:10CV00143PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Recommendation”) was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 23, 2010, was served on the parties in this action. Within the time limits prescribed by section 636, Defendant Cemex, Inc. (“Cemex”) filed objections. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff James E. Lunsford (“Lunsford”) filed a response to the objections (Doc. 15), and the Defendant filed a reply (Doc. 17). All objections are now ripe for disposition.
I. BACKGROUND
Lunsford filed a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kelton Arms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. Homestead Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sherrod v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berry v. Perdue Farms IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- DECKER v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
- FREEMAN v. HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC. OF IOWADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Freeman v. Heartland Express, Inc. of IowaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- HACKWORTH v. PACCAR INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.