Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 1996No. 95-830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for burglary with assault or battery, robbery, possession of cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and obstructing an officer without violence. We reverse, however, the trial court’s order of restitution because it was entered without notice or a hearing. Dubois v. State, 650 So.2d 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Rhoden v. State, 622 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Harris v. State, 593 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The state properly concedes error in the trial court’s imposition of restitution.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rhoden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Dubois v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Bridgewater v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API