State v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLINS, Judge. *
Appealing his sentence for multiple current convictions, Appellant Rashade Coleman argues that (1) the district court erred by imposing both a permissive consecutive sentence for his burglary conviction (consecutive to an unexpired prior felony sentence) and a permissive consecutive sentence for criminal sexual conduct (consecutive to the burglary); (2) the court erred by failing to disregard his criminal-history score before determining the duration of the burglary sentence imposed consecutive to his prior unexpired sentence or failing to state reasons specific to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008