Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 2007No. A06-325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge. *

Appealing his sentence for multiple current convictions, Appellant Rashade Coleman argues that (1) the district court erred by imposing both a permissive consecutive sentence for his burglary conviction (consecutive to an unexpired prior felony sentence) and a permissive consecutive sentence for criminal sexual conduct (consecutive to the burglary); (2) the court erred by failing to disregard his criminal-history score before determining the duration of the burglary sentence imposed consecutive to his prior unexpired sentence or failing to state reasons specific to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API