Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Testament & Codicil Thereto of Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The releases and agreements which the contestant executed in connection with the transfer of decedent’s real property fall far short of constituting an estoppel in pais, and do not prevent her from interposing the objections which she has filed to the probate of decedent’s will. Neither can we say on the affidavits before us that the objections which have been stricken out by the surrogate are false and sham. Mr. Whitney would be incompetent, under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act, to testify on a trial *379as to many of the facts which he sets forth in his affidavit. On a motion of this…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RobertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of FrorupNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API