Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gilmore v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 10, 1934No. 9879Published

1ConcurrenceGilbert, J.

We have been requested to review and overrule the case of New York Life Insurance Co. v. Gilmore, 171 Ga. 894 (supra). That was a unanimous decision of this court, and is binding until it is reviewed and overruled. It requires the unanimous concurrence of all of the Justices to overrule it; and since all of the Justices do not favor overruling the case, the motion is necessarily denied. I dissent from the refusal to review and overrule that ease. The question is of such importance that I think it pardonable to give my reasons for such dissent. The case should be overruled for several reasons:…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Georgia & Alabama RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Rusk v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Tucker v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Torrance v. McDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API