Legal Opinion

Cook v. Marks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1942No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 41,952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

After this case was submitted on briefs, we requested counsel to submit further briefs on the equities between the parties. There is no question but that Federal regulations prevent the transfer of these United States savings bonds, either by way of security or otherwise. Defendants' plan involved a transfer of the bonds as security for a loan. This is shown by the promissory note and agreement under which the bonds were deposited with the defendants by Mrs. Cook:

"If the security afforded by said property (the bonds), shall, * * * be insufficient, said holder (Marks) may without notice * * *…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKay v. PalmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API