Legal Opinion

Madden v. Wilde

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1934No. 1860PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

In this case the court rendered judgment declaring the claim of John Madden, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, to be a preferred claim against all of the assets of the Riverton State Bank, now in the process of liquidation. From this judgment the State Examiner has appealed. He allowed the claim as a general one, and contends that it should not have been allowed as a preferred claim.

The evidence shows: On July 25, 1932, claimant had in his possession a check, apparently on a Wisconsin bank, for the sum of §9668.10. On that day he, in company with Mrs. Burke, went to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Matter of International M. Co. (Broderick)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. King v. Bowling Green Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Lusk Development & Improvement Co. v. GiintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Witt, Rec'r v. Peoples State Bank of S.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Noble-Trotter Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Western Nat. Bank of Casper v. Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1974
  3. Madden v. Wilde, St. Examr.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ex Parte Calcasieu-Marine Nat'l BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. McIlroy v. N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API