Legal Opinion

Hearne v. Chillicothe & Brunswick Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 15, 1873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

'Appeal from, Livingston Circuit Contri.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

This was an action under the Mechanic’s Lien Law.

The plaintiffs allege, that they were original contractors to furnish mkterials to the Chillicothe and Brunswick Railroad Company for their freight and passenger depots.in the City of Chillicothe, and did furnish such materials to the amount of'$817.55, which were used in said buildings, and for which they filed a lien.

*325The answer of the defendants was a general denial of the allegations of the petition.

The plaintiffs gave evidence conducing to prove their account and lien. The evidence was to the effect, that the president, on behalf of the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. BCI Corp. v. Charlebois Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Ambrose Manufacturing Co. v. GapenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Jordan v. Natrona Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Matthews v. Wagenhaeuser Brewing Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wahouma Drug Co. v. Kirkpatrick Sand & Cement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API