Legal Opinion

Rickard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1968No. 3 Div. 278PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Appeal from denial of coram nobis. In the circuit court the State’s motion to dismiss was granted under Supreme Court Rule 50 which provides in part:

“ * * * and the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive petition for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner. A successive petition on different grounds will not be entertained unless good cause is shown why the new ground or grounds were not known or could not have been reasonably ascertained when the first petition was heard.”

Originally Rickard claims he was indicted for robbery and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Woodard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Seibert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Upshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Burden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API