Legal Opinion
Rickard v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 1968No. 3 Div. 278PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Appeal from denial of coram nobis. In the circuit court the State’s motion to dismiss was granted under Supreme Court Rule 50 which provides in part:
“ * * * and the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive petition for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner. A successive petition on different grounds will not be entertained unless good cause is shown why the new ground or grounds were not known or could not have been reasonably ascertained when the first petition was heard.”
Originally Rickard claims he was indicted for robbery and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Woodard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seibert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Upshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Burden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.