Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1985No. 10-84-07913, 10-84-07914, 10-84-09595, 10-84-09596, 10-84-09597, 10-84-09676; CA A35637, A35638, A35639, A35640, A35641, A35642Published

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of six counts of burglary in the first degree. He appeals the convictions on four of the counts which were based on his being armed with burglar’s tools. He contends that his convictions in those cases must be modified to convictions of burglary in the second degree, because the tools in question were not established to be burglar’s tools. ORS 164.235(2). The state concedes that defendant is correct. We agree. State v. Graves, 299 Or 189, 700 P2d 244 (1985); State v. Sells, 299 Or 198, 702 P2d 68 (1985).

In cases 10-84-07913, 10-84-07914, 10-84-09595 and 10-84-09676 the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SellsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API