Vaughner v. City of Atlanta

According to the defendant in error’s brief, “this ease presents one simple legal question, as follows: was the conviction of the defendant for violation of the lottery ordinance legal when the copy of charges designated the offense as ‘disorderly conduct?”’ The record discloses that there is an ordinance in the City of Atlanta against “disorderly conduct,” as follows: “Any person, who shall, within the corporate limits of Atlanta, be guilty of an act of public indecency, tending to debauch the morals of any of the citizens, or of quarrelling, or of using obscene, vulgar, profane language, or…