Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Reisley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The insurance company’s appeal: The order of April 14, 1942, was based upon an interpretation of § 36-a of the New York Lien Law, Consol.Laws, c. 33, as in effect before amendments effective. September 1, 1942.1 ******But since April 1942, New York’s highest court has held that that statute creates no lien. See Raymond Concrete Pile Co. v. Federation Bank & Trust Co., 288 N.Y. 452, 43 N.E.2d 486; New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 293 N.Y. 884, 59 N.E.2d 787. The insurance company’s appeal must therefore fail.2 We cannot agree with the insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Raymond Concrete Pile Co. v. Federation Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by26 opinions
- J. Clarke Smith and Margaret D. Smith v. Edwin E. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Sobel v. DiatzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Grand Union Equipment Co. v. LippnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. Qimonda AG (In Re Qimonda AG Bankruptcy Litigation)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Maryland Tuna Corp. v. MS BenaresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.