Legal Opinion

In Re McGovern Auto Specialty, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1984No. 19-10991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

In deciding whether to grant a creditor’s request for relief from the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) we must determine whether the creditor’s notice to the debtor of termination of the leasehold was adequate. For the reasons expressed below, we conclude that the notice was sufficient and will enter an order granting relief from the stay.

The facts of the case are as follows: 1 Ram Partnership (“Ram”) leased a parcel of improved realty to the debtor in 1982 under a written lease. By March of 1984 the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mercer County Agriculture Society v. BarnhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re DeSantisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Adams v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Adams)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. In Re C & C Tv & Appliance, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re Future Growth Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API