Legal Opinion

Cope v. Dancy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1923No. 14271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county in favor of defendant in error, defendant below.

The first question confronting us is the question of jurisdiction. The defendant in error contends that there was no order made and entered of record extending time for preparing case-made at the time motion for new trial was overruled and the amendment by order of this court for the purpose of correcting the record and under the supervision of Judge Prank Mathews, assigned judge, by placing in the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. ChappelleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Ramsey v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. FarleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. KitchenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Patrick v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. KitchenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API