Legal Opinion

Kipp v. Bullard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Sibley county, Macdonald, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The action is in ejectment. The complaint alleges title and right to possession in plaintiff, without disclosing the source of his title. The answer denies plaintiff’s title, and alleges •title in the defendant Carl Bullard. On the trial plaintiff attempted to make out title through an execution sale under a judgment against Gottlieb Bullard, the husband of defendant Caroline, and father of •defendant Carl. The land sold consisted of 160 acres, on which Gottlieb lived with his family as their homestead at the date of docketing the judgment against him, and to and at the date of his death; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bottineau v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. O'Brien v. HeggenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Coles v. YorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. McArthur v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Henderson v. WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API