Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kasser
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 11, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-90PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHIPPLE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this action for injunctive and other relief against nine individual and corporate defendants. As set forth in detail infra, the complaint alleges numerous violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), together with Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 17 CFR 240.10b-5. Additionally, there is a cross-claim in the cause which is not material at this stage of the proceedings.
With the exception of Alexander Kasser,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,623 Eckart R. Straub v. Vaisman and Company, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Appellant, v. Alexander KASSER Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Sebastian International, Inc. v. Consumer Contact (PTY) Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Recaman v. BarishDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.