Legal Opinion

Adams v. Spoelstra

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1977No. 35-751, SC 24709PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for medical malpractice filed by plaintiff as guardian ad litem for her minor son. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant. We affirm.

Generally, plaintiff alleged that her infant son had a bladder obstruction and that the defendant osteopath failed to properly diagnose the problem, failed to employ the necessary diagnostic tests, failed to properly treat the child’s condition and failed to consult a specialist. 1 The complaint further alleged that as a result of defendant’s negligence plaintiff’s son suffered serious permanent injuries.

Plai…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. BantaOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gatewood v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API