Legal Opinion

Shoen v. Baker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 3, 1930No. 29,333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action to quiet title to the east half of a vacated avenue which lies between the lots of plaintiff and de*631fendant, the plaintiff claiming the reversion of the entire avenue when vacated and the defendant claiming the east half, which is adjacent to her lot. The trial court decided in favor of the defendant, dividing the avenue equally between plaintiff and defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The agreed statement of facts on which the case was tried was, in substance, as follows: In 1885 one Louisa Olive owned a tract of land which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Tousley v. Galena Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Showalter v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luttgen v. ErgenbrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Luttgen v. ErgenbrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Winter Park Pines Development Co. v. KohlossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API