Legal Opinion

Hackett v. . McMillan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893Published

1Opinion of the Court

The sole question presented in the appeal is this: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action?

In White v. Jones, 88 N.C. 166, in which case the plaintiffs here were defendants, Ruffin, J., states one of the questions presented by that appeal as follows: "Whether the sums due from the defendant Bledsoe for rents during his occupation of the land are to be appropriated to the satisfaction of the amount ascertained to be due him, or to the debt still due the estate of Mrs. Stokes for the balance of the purchase-money thereof." And, discussing that, in a subsequent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. White v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Metcalf v. . AlleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API