Legal Opinion

State v. Whitson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Scire facias against bail upon a forfeited recognizance. The condition of the recognizance is as follows: “That if the said Harman Whitson shall personally be and *179appear before the judges of the Parke Circuit Court, on the first day of the next term thereof, to be holden at the house in Rockville on the last Monday of February next, then and there in said Court to answer unto the state of Indiana on an indictment for a riot, and not depart the Court without leave, and abide the order and judgment thereof,” &c. The said Harman appeared on the first day of the term of the Court to which he was…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Ramsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API