Legal Opinion

Crossman v. Quimby

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

On April 15, 1930, the plaintiff, Fred S. Crossman, conveyed to Morris Nassau the Crossman Block, so called, in Claremont. On May 1 Nassau executed a power-of-sale mortgage of the premises to Crossman to secure an installment note given in part payment of the purchase price. Nassau having failed to pay the first installment, the plaintiff proceeded to foreclose the mortgage. Thereupon Nassau brought an action against Crossman for covenant broken, alleging that the town of Claremont claimed title to a part of the premises, which Crossman had covenanted to be free and clear of incumbrances.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Members of Democratic Executive Committee v. HatcherMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. New England Fiber Co. v. Bath Fiber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API