Trowbridge v. Fascio

JiBYRNES, Judge.

Plaintiff purchased a car from a company other than defendant-relator. Within the month, plaintiff purchased a second car from relator allegedly because relator’s salesman represented that he would somehow cancel the promissory note on the first car. When the plaintiff applied for credit on the second car, he did not disclose the debt on the first car. The note was not cancelled, and the salesman allegedly converted the car for use on a personal vacation.1 Unable to make payments on both notes, the plaintiff filed for bankruptcy. In his Schedule of Assets, he did not disclose…