Legal Opinion

Piche v. City of Winooski

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 18, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtWillcox, J.

This is a proceeding under G. L. 4164, instituted by the petitioner, whose land had been taken by the right of eminent domain for public school purposes. In its nature it is a session proceeding, brought to this Court on exceptions under G. L. 2257; and is to be determined as though heard upon a petition for certiorari. Hooker v. Montpelier and Wells River R. R. Co., 62 Vt. 47, 19 Atl. 775.

The commissioners appointed under the statute filed a report, February 16, 1929; the court ordered the same recommitted with direction to amend; and amended report was filed April 27, 1929. The original…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  2. Rutter v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. Hooker v. Montpelier & White River RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  4. Boyce v. BolsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API