Legal Opinion

Strachan v. Burford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1931No. 8301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “A consideration is valid if any benefit accrues to him who makes the promise, or any injury to him who receives the promise.” Civil Code, § 4242; Gormerly v. Chapman, 51 Ga. 421; Crine v. Davis, 68 Ga. 138, 141; Roberts v. Davis, 72 Ga. 819, 824; Burruss v. Smith, 75 Ga. 710 (2) ; Sanders v. Carter, 91 Ga. 450 (2), 460 (17 S. E. 345) ; Bluthenthal v. Moore, 106 Ga. 424, 426 (32 S. E. 344). On principle it is immaterial whether the promisor or promisee initiated the negotiations which resulted in the promise.(a) The foregoing does not conflict with the rulings of this court in *822Bush v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Brosseau v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Johnson v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Sanders & Ables v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Bluthenthal & Bickart v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Webb v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Barnes v. DidschuneitCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Barnes v. DidschuneitCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API