Legal Opinion

Hodgman v. Concord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPike, J.

The injury for which the plaintiff seeks damages was complete when the change of grade was made,, and he was then entitled to compensation for the defendants’ act. His right of > action was not affected by the conveyance ©f the premises Boynton v. Railroad, 4 Cush. 467, 469; Moore v. Boston, 8 Cush. 274; New York & New England R. R. v. Drury, 133 Mass. 167, 169; Bean v. Warner, 38 N. H. 247.

Exception overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York and New England Railroad v. DruryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hadlock v. JaffreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910