Legal Opinion
Cardozo v. Graham
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 15, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-10492-JLTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Nancy K. Cardozo brings this action against the United States Fish and Wild life Service (“FWS”), an agency of the Department of the Interior, and several agency employees, alleging that defendants violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2520 (Count I) by intercepting and recording her telephone conversation with a FWS agent. In addition, plaintiff alleges claims for the negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Counts II and III), and for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (Counts IV and V), premised upon underlying violations…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- John L. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meyer v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Campbell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Day v. Massachusetts Air National GuardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Capozzi v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Sahinov v. GEICO Advantage Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021