Legal Opinion

QuantlabTechnologies, Ltd. (BVI) v. Kuharsky

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2017No. 16-20242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Defendants-Appellants Andriy Kuharsky and Emmanuel Mamalakis appeal a final judgment against them and in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Quantlab Financial, L.L.C. and Quantlab Technologies (herein- ■ after referred to in the singular as “Quant-lab”) following a jury trial and the district court’s denial of Kuharsky and Mamalak-is’s motions for judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.

I. Background

We must examine the record in the light most favorable to the jury verdict:

We review the denial of a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law de novo,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Smith v. EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quantlab Techs. Ltd. v. GodlevskyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API