QuantlabTechnologies, Ltd. (BVI) v. Kuharsky
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Defendants-Appellants Andriy Kuharsky and Emmanuel Mamalakis appeal a final judgment against them and in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Quantlab Financial, L.L.C. and Quantlab Technologies (herein- ■ after referred to in the singular as “Quant-lab”) following a jury trial and the district court’s denial of Kuharsky and Mamalak-is’s motions for judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.
I. Background
We must examine the record in the light most favorable to the jury verdict:
We review the denial of a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law de novo,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quantlab Techs. Ltd. v. GodlevskyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018