Legal Opinion

Cusimano v. Port Esplanade Condominium Ass'n

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2011No. 2010-CA-0477PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

| ,The immovable property located on the lakeside corner of Dauphine Street and *933Esplanade Avenue in the French Quarter is subject to a regime established by the Declaration of Condominium for Port Esplanade Condominium Association. The Port Esplanade condominiums include two distinct residential buildings.1 The plaintiffs and appellants are the current owners of the condo units located in the building facing Dauphine, and for convenience we refer to them as the “Dauphine Owners”.2 The defendant and appellee is the condominium association, and for convenience we refer to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. McLean v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Council of City of New Orleans v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. Brandt v. EngleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Yokum v. Pat O'Brien's Bar, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. FMC Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Prytania-St. Mary Condominiums Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Town Houses at Bonnet Shores Condominium Ass'n v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  4. Hooper v. Hero Lands Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Orleans Parish School Board v. Lexington Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API