Legal Opinion

Noll v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1934No. 31,789PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an autiojpagainst directors of a corporation brought by jhe_receive.r of the corporation to recover for losses sustained by the corporation because of the investment of its funds in enterprises beyond its charter powers. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The petition of plaintiff states nine causes of action. The purposes for which the corporation was organized are expressed in the charter as follows:

*253“To acquire or sell and otherwise dispose of and deal in .commercial paper and the doing of all things necessary and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Stewart v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Holmes v. CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  3. Weigand v. Union Nat'l Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Harman v. WillbernDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1974
  5. Hylton Harman, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Coffeyville Loan and Investment Company v. D. A. WillbernCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API