Legal Opinion

Reichers v. Fenn

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoddart, J.

The plaintiff landlord claims that $600 is due under the terms of a written lease. The defendant concedes that $100 is due and tenders payment in that amount. The lease was for a term of six months, commencing September 15, 1942. It contained a clause permitting the lessee to cancel the lease “ after the fifteenth day of December * * * by giving the landlord thirty (30) days written notice of termination of this lease and agrees to pay the rent to the end of the calendar month following that in which the notice is given * * * . ” The defendant vacated the premises on December 15th, after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodbridge Co. v. Charles E. Hires Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Woodbridge Company v. . Hires CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Alfalfa D. & M. Co. v. 4010 Washington, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Public Relations Board, Inc. v. United Van Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API