Legal Opinion

Estate of Ames v. Markesan State Bank

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 6, 1989No. 88-1067PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

The estate of Chauncey C. Ames appeals from a judgment dismissing certain of its claims against the Markesan State Bank. The estate claims that the bank, both in its capacity as guardian and trustee, breached a Wisconsin per se rule against trustee and guardian self-dealing when it invested guardianship and trust assets in its own certificates of deposit (C.D.'s). Additionally, the estate argues that the bank breached its duty under the prudent person rule, sec. 881.01, Stats., by failing to invest all or a substantial portion of the trust assets in tax-free municipal bonds, an action which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Terpstra v. Soiltest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Estate of SwiecickiIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. L & W Construction Co. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. In Re Messer TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brian French v. Wachovia BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Old Kent Bank v. Remainder BeneficiariesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API