Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hollywood Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1988No. 87-1511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HELIO GOMEZ, Associate Judge.

Vera Williams purchased a used car from Hollywood Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. under an express thirty-day warranty for all parts and labor and an extended Chrysler warranty. Prior to issuing the extended warranty, the dealer inspected the car, including the transmission, and pronounced it fit for use. Two days later, Williams brought the car back, complaining of transmission and brake problems. The car was serviced and pronounced “fixed”. Williams was told to check the brake and transmission fluids frequently. Two weeks later, Williams still had to jiggle the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive SystemSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Holman v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Williams v. Florida Realty & Management Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Bill Kelley Chevrolet, Inc. v. KerrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Phillips Buick-Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. DallonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Riley v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API