C.A. Staack Partnership v. Board of County Commissioners
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Plaintiffs, C.A. Staack Partnership and Gary Cooper, appeal a district court judgment affirming the Arapahoe County Board of Equalization’s determination that under Colo. Sess. Laws 1983, ch. 426, § 39-1-102(1.6)(a) at 1486, plaintiffs’ land was not “agricultural” for purposes of assessment. We reverse and remand with directions.
Plaintiff C.A. Staack Partnership owns a 20-acre parcel of land and plaintiff Cooper owns a non-contiguous one-acre parcel, both of which are partially surrounded by approximately 500 acres of land that is classified as “agricultural land” and is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heagney v. SchneiderColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Burns v. City Council of City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- County Board of Equalization v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boulder County Board of Equalization v. M.D.C. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Gyurman v. Weld County Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Cherry Hills Country Club v. Board of County Commissioners of County of ArapahoeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Andrew v. Teller County Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.