Legal Opinion

C.A. Staack Partnership v. Board of County Commissioners

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1990No. 89CA1249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Plaintiffs, C.A. Staack Partnership and Gary Cooper, appeal a district court judgment affirming the Arapahoe County Board of Equalization’s determination that under Colo. Sess. Laws 1983, ch. 426, § 39-1-102(1.6)(a) at 1486, plaintiffs’ land was not “agricultural” for purposes of assessment. We reverse and remand with directions.

Plaintiff C.A. Staack Partnership owns a 20-acre parcel of land and plaintiff Cooper owns a non-contiguous one-acre parcel, both of which are partially surrounded by approximately 500 acres of land that is classified as “agricultural land” and is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heagney v. SchneiderColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Burns v. City Council of City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. County Board of Equalization v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boulder County Board of Equalization v. M.D.C. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Gyurman v. Weld County Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Board of Assessment Appeals v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Cherry Hills Country Club v. Board of County Commissioners of County of ArapahoeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Andrew v. Teller County Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API