Mahar v. Bartnick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Initially, plaintiff argues that questions of fact exist regarding whether she sustained a serioús injury based on evidence submitted to Supreme Court in connection with defendant’s motion. In supp.ort of that motion, defendant relied upon plaintiffs medical records, the results of an MRI, records of plaintiffs physical therapy sessions, deposition testimony and reports regarding plaintiffs condition prepared by an orthopedic surgeon retained by her carrier to examine her (see Clark v Basco, 83 AD3d 1136, 1137 [2011]; Dean v Ahn Ja Jin, 78 AD3d 1297, 1298 [2010]). Specifically, this evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Clark v. BascoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Howard v. EspinosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Tuna v. BabendererdeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Caruso v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Womack v. WilhelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cole v. Roberts-BonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cross v. LabombardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- SMYTH, THERESA A. v. MCDONALD, BENJAMIN J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Schmidt v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.