Legal Opinion

Town of North Hempstead v. Stern

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to recover parcels of land and damages for alleged trespass thereto.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Siclen, J.

The above-entitled action is brought by the town of North Hempstead to recover two parcels of land described in the complaint at the easterly part of what is known as Mott’s Cove, Hemp-stead harbor, Nassau county, N. Y., and, by a separately stated cause of action, for damages for an al*521leged trespass by defendant in removing or destroying certain oyster ponds or “ drinks ” constructed below high-water mark in front of defendant’s upland. Said action was tried before this court and a jury at the June Trial Term, 1914, and at the close of the entire case both parties moved for a direction of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Miller v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Lawrence v. . Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Town of North Hempstead v. OelsnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. The Town of North Hempstead v. . OelsnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Olin v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Town of North Hempstead v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API