Legal Opinion

Goosen v. Packard Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1913No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Case by James Goosen by his next friend against the Packard Motor Car Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal inj uries. The plaintiff, at the time of his injury, a lad of 13 years of age, was riding a bicycle in the easterly direction upon Jefferson avenue, in the city of Detroit. He was accompanied by a companion some three years older than himself. When near McDougall avenue, the boys overtook a motor truck belonging to defendant. The truck likewise was proceeding easterly upon Jefferson avenue. It was a heavy service truck weighing about three tons, and capable of carrying a load of equal weight, and was running at a speed of from 8 to 10 miles…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sterling v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Derrick v. BlazersMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hale v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Bliss v. KaplanMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Patterson v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Alice Patterson, Administratrix of the Estate of Harry G. Patterson, Jr., Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, City of Detroit, a Municipal Corporation v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API