Tchlenoff v. Dyner
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
This is a motion pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order striking out the answer of the defendant Dyner and granting judgment to the plaintiff.
The action is upon a promissory note made by said defendant payable to plaintiff and indorsed by the corporate defendant. The making and delivery of the note are admitted; no defense is pleaded other than a purported claim of usury.
In this separate defense which is paragraph marked “ Third ” of the answer, it is alleged that the plaintiff and the said defendant Dyner entered into an agreement whereby the plaintiff agreed “ to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Baldwin v. . DoyingNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- D. S. Stern & Co. v. PizitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re General American Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986