Legal Opinion

Spartanburg County v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1949No. 16189Published

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Chief Justice.

The complaint in this action alleges, for a first cause of action, the capacity of the respondent to maintain this action, the fact that the appellant is and was a duly qualified magistrate of the County respondent, and the duty of the appellant to pay over to the respondent all fines, bonds and costs, etc., collected by him in his official capacity. It further alleges that the appellant collected and reported during the period ending June 30, 1945, the sum of $31.00, and from the period of October 1, 1945, to October 10, 1945, the sum of $1,017.58, and has failed and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Columbia Gaslight Co. v. Mobley, TreasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Truesdell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Rookard v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Smith v. South Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API