Legal Opinion

Bruno v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 1993No. 143, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Petitioner, Michael Anthony Bruno, was tried in the Circuit Court for Harford County on stipulated evidence and was convicted of first degree rape by the trial judge (Whitfíll, J.). Bruno appealed his conviction, challenging the admissibility of incriminating statements that he made to three different individuals. At a pretrial motions hearing, the trial judge denied a motion to suppress these statements, and they were included as part of the stipulated evidence. On appeal, the Court of Special Appeals ruled that the statements to two of the three individuals were…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. KarwackiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API