Legal Opinion
Fowler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 19, 2017No. Civil Action No. 4:17–1081–RMGPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT: And you, by 2013, you had multiple occasions to interact with Mr. Vanderhall?
MR. HATFIELD: No, sir. No, we did not. You know, he was a quadriplegic. His mother, Theresa Vanderhall, was actually our go between.
As you remember from the-I'll call it the Vanderhall State Farm[-]I, Miss Vanderhall was the one who engaged us shortly after the accident. And our dealings were solely with her.
(Dkt. No. 38 at 3-4.)
THE COURT: Mr. Hatfield ... Answer my question yes or no. Were you satisfied he was competent?
MR. HATFIELD: I had a good faith belief that he was, because I dealt with his mother.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Deborah Katz Pueschel v. United States of America, Deborah Katz Pueschel v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Burbach Broadcasting Company of Delaware v. Elkins Radio Corporation Cat Radio IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Tyrone Andrews v. J. M. Daw, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bolds v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Coffey & McKenzie LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Hegedus v. US Bank National Association, not in its individuaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
- Hencely v. Fluor CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Reeves v. South Carolina Municipal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.