Legal Opinion

Lo Bianco v. Holt

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

The plaintiffs are copartners engaged in the cigarette vending business. They place their vending machines in stores and other places of business with the consent of the owners or storekeepers. All such machines are placed by two of the three plaintiff partners, who personally service them by making collections, refilling them with cigarettes and keeping the machines in good mechanical order. The plaintiffs have no regular, temporary or any other employees to do this work. '

The defendant union, unsuccessful in its efforts to induce the two partners to join its union, commenced picketing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Thompson v. BoekhoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Baillis v. FuchsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. People v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simon v. Journeymen Barbers International Union Local No. 315Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. People v. TobinNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1947
  3. Sutton v. MarvidikisUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Newsday, Inc. v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API