Legal Opinion
United States v. Harry Haddad
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1977No. 77-1411PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Harry Haddad was convicted of one count of receipt by a felon of a firearm which has been shipped or transported in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h)(1). 1 On appeal, he contends that Congress did not intend for the statute to reach his conduct, and if it did, then it exceeded its power under the commerce clause. Furthermore, he asserts that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. He also challenges the trial court’s finding that he lacked standing to attack the validity of the search which produced the firearm and that this search deprived…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Deerfield Medical Center, Medallion Executive Consultants, Inc. v. City of Deerfield Beach, City Commission of Deerfield BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Douglas Edward RamboCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Richard Samuel HuffhinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Calvin Lamar Bosby, Alan Maurice Ticey, and Charles F. Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.