Legal Opinion

Schad v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1888PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court. —How. E. L. Edwards, Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing instruction number one, asked by defendant. Taylor v. Zepp, 14 Mo. 487. (2) The court also erred in refusing instruction number three, as asked by defendant. Blair v. Smith, 16 Mo. 281. (3) Defendant’s instruction, number eight, was improperly refused.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court. —How. E. L. Edwards, Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing instruction number one, asked by defendant. Taylor v. Zepp, 14 Mo. 487. (2) The court also erred in refusing instruction number three, as asked by defendant. Blair v. Smith, 16 Mo. 281. (3) Defendant’s instruction, number eight, was improperly refused. Turner r>. Balter, 64 Mo. 239; Lindell v. McLaughlin, 30 Mo. 32; Acton v. Dooley, 74 Mo. 68; Major v. Rice, 57 Mo. 384; Cole v. Parlter, 70 Mo. 373; McAninch v. Smith, 19 Mo. App. 244. (4) The amended answer to the original petition was •improperly…

1Opinion of the CourtBkace, J.

This is an action in ejectment to recover possession of a strip of land containing something less than one acre, the ownership of, which depends on the location of the line between the northwest quarter and the southwest quarter of section twenty-six, township forty-three, range sixteen, in Morgan county. The petition is in the usual form, the answer a general denial, with a plea of the statute of limitations. The adverse possession was denied in the reply. The case was tried before a jury, and the plaintiff obtained judgment, from which defendant appeals, and urges a reversal upon grounds…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ZeppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  2. Acton v. DooleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Anderson v. McPikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Gates v. TustenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. Jacobs v. MoseleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Forrister v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax in Estate of LankfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Hadley v. BerneroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API