Legal Opinion

Dart v. McGraw

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1939No. 31,966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order granting defendant’s motion to strike the reply as sham and frivolous and for judgment on the pleadings. The complaint alleges that defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $210, the balance due for the use and occupation of certain real property in Litchfield of which plaintiff is the record owner in fee. The answer consists of two paragraphs, the first a general denial, and the second as follows:

“Defendant alleges that the subject matter alleged in the complaint herein was fully adjudicated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. HardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Sundin v. County Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Deli v. HasselmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Seeman v. HladyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API