Legal Opinion

Emmanuel Chioma v. Kelly Santoro

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 17, 2026No. 3:26-cv-02255Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EMMANUEL CHIOMA, Case No. 26-cv-02255-RFL (PR) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. KELLY SANTORO, Dkt. No. 2 Respondent. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Emmanuel Chioma seeks federal habeas relief from his California state convictions for sexual assault and robbery. The petition for habeas relief is now before the Court for review pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2243

and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The petition states cognizable claims. Accordingly, on or before December 14, 2026, Respondent shall file an answer or a dispositive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. People v. Edwards, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API