Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Pennsylvania RR Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 13, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

54 N.J. Super. 149 (1959)

148 A.2d 515

MARGARET HAMMOND, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF JOHN HAMMOND, DECEASED, AND DEBORAH HAMMOND, JOHN HAMMOND, JR., MERRIAL HAMMOND, WAYNE HAMMOND AND LEIGHTON HAMMOND, MINORS, BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND, MERRIAL A. KYLER, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND THE NEW YORK AND LONG BRANCH RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND P.S. WENTZ, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided February 13, 1959.

Mr. Eugene Capibianco, attorney for the guardian ad litem.

Messrs. Hanlon, Argeris & Crahay (Mr. Stephen A. Argeris…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Hanna v. State Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Poff v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Hiser v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. Tug ShrikeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Bell v. Tug ShrikeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API