Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1913No. 3530PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court; Beaver County; R. H. Loo-fbourrow, Judge. Action between W. I. Jones and Winona Jones. From the judgment, Winona Jones brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

Counsel for defendant in error have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the reasons, among others, that it does not appear from the record or the purported case-made, cr otherwise, that the defendant in error was present, either personally or by counsel, at the settlement, or that notice of the time and place thereof was served or waived, or what amendments suggested, if any, were allowed or disallowed by the court. These grounds are sufficient, and require the dismissal of the' case-made, if true. An inspection of the record shows that it supports the claims made, and under the law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. J. K. Cobb & Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Richardson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CoyleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Foral v. BogleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. First Nat. Bank of Wellston v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Pain v. WylieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Comanche Mercantile Co. v. Northwestern Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API